top of page

Independence Matters: The Executive Technology Assessment

  • Writer: Lauren Scott
    Lauren Scott
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • 4 min read

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

The Bottom Line Upfront: Why Independence Matters 


Two people reviewing a document, surrounded by digital circuit patterns. The background is blue with colorful lines and icons, conveying focus.

Technology decisions shape organizational capability and competitive positioning for years. The stakes are too high for vendor-biased guidance. 


The data on IT project performance is sobering, according to the Standish Group's CHAOS Report, which has tracked IT project outcomes since 1994; only 31% of projects are considered successful (delivered on time, on budget, with satisfactory results). Fully 50% are "challenged," and 19% fail.


CIOs facing major decisions need independent advisors who: 

  • Have no financial stake in vendor outcomes 

  • Bring implementation experience across multiple organizations 

  • Provide proven frameworks that accelerate decisions 

  • Deliver measurable value through reduced failure rates and cost optimization 

  • Build internal capabilities that reduce future dependence 


The economics are compelling: advisory investments typically deliver 10-40x returns through failure prevention, cost optimization, and accelerated benefit realization. 

But the strategic value extends beyond financial returns. Independent advisory services transform how organizations approach technology decisions—building confidence, reducing risk, and creating sustainable competitive advantages through informed technology choices. 


The question every CIO should ask isn't whether to engage an independent advisor. It's whether they can afford to make multi-million dollar decisions without it. 

 

Advisory investments typically deliver 10-40x returns through failure prevention, cost optimization, & accelerated benefit realization. 

business owner ready to get started on his cybersecurity journey

The 90-Minute Executive Impact Session 

Most advisory relationships begin with focused discussion of immediate challenges: 


Discussion Topics: 

  • Upcoming major technology decisions 

  • Current technology initiatives facing challenges 

  • Board or executive concerns about technology strategy 

  • Competitive pressures requiring technology response 

  • Budget constraints limiting technology investments 


Assessment Outcomes: 

  • Quick-win identification for immediate impact 

  • Risk assessment of current initiatives 

  • Preliminary ROI projections for advisory engagement 

  • Clear next steps for deeper assessment 


Decision Framework: Following the session, organizations have clarity on: 

  • Whether independent advisory addresses their specific needs 

  • Expected value creation from advisory relationship 

  • Appropriate engagement model and investment level 

  • Timeline for assessment and decision support 

 

Or consider the Comprehensive Technology Strategy Assessment 

For organizations facing multiple decisions or broader strategic questions, a comprehensive assessment provides a foundation for a sustained advisory relationship: 


Typical Timeline: 4-6 weeks and the Components Include: 

1. Current State Analysis: 

  • Technology landscape documentation 

  • Spending pattern analysis 

  • Project portfolio review 

  • Organizational capability assessment 


2. Strategic Alignment Review: 

  • Business strategy and objectives 

  • Gap analysis 

  • Prioritization framework 


3. Decision Pipeline Evaluation: 

  • Upcoming major decisions 

  • Risk identification 

  • Timeline optimization 


4. Recommendation Development: 

  • Prioritized technology roadmap 

  • Decision frameworks for major choices 

  • Risk mitigation strategies 

  • Investment optimization opportunities 


Deliverables: 

  • Comprehensive assessment report 

  • Executive presentation 

  • Board-ready strategy summary 

  • 12-18 month advisory roadmap 


Expected Outcomes: 

  • Clear technology strategy aligned with business objectives 

  • Prioritized decision roadmap 

  • Identified quick-win opportunities 

  • Foundation for sustained advisory relationship 

 "The stakes are too high for vendor-biased guidance."

Ready to Transform Your Technology Decision-Making? 

 

For large IT projects those with budgets exceeding $15 million. McKinsey and the University of Oxford found that these projects run 45% over budget on average and deliver 56% less value than predicted. One in six large IT projects becomes a "black swan" event with cost overruns averaging 200% and schedule overruns of nearly 70%.


If you're facing major technology decisions and want independent expertise that delivers measurable value, we welcome the conversation. 


Dynamical's technology advisory provides: 

Complete Independence: No vendor partnerships, no implementation markups, no conflicts of interest. Our only incentive is your success. 


Practitioner Expertise: Our advisors have personally led major technology implementations across dozens of organizations. We bring implementation reality, not just theoretical frameworks. 


Proven Methodology: Battle-tested approaches that reduce decision cycles by 40-60% while improving decision quality. 


Measurable Outcomes: 65% reduction in project failure rates, 15-30% cost optimization, and accelerated benefit realization. 


Long-Term Partnership: We stay engaged through implementation, ensuring recommendations actually work. 


Book your free Impact Session!


Schedule your complimentary Executive Impact Session to discuss your specific technology decisions and explore how independent advisory can deliver measurable value.

 

Or learn more about our technology advisory services designed specifically for CIOs facing major decisions. 

 

Frequently Asked Questions: 

How do you maintain independence if you also do implementation work? 

We maintain strict separation. Advisory engagements focus purely on strategy and vendor selection. If clients choose to engage us for implementation, it's a separate decision after vendor selection is complete. We're transparent about this model and ensure clients understand their options. 


Q: What if we already have relationships with vendors you might recommend? 

A: That's fine. Our job is identifying the right solution for your needs, not disrupting existing successful relationships. If your current vendors offer the best solution, we'll recommend them. If better alternatives exist, we'll explain why objectively. 


Q: Can advisory really reduce failure rates that dramatically? 

A: Yes, for two reasons: First, we prevent obviously wrong decisions before they're made. Second, we identify implementation risks early and help mitigate them. Most failures are predictable and preventable with experienced oversight. 


Q: How do you stay current across rapidly changing technology landscapes? 

A: Our advisors maintain active relationships across the industry, regularly evaluate new technologies, and engage continuously with the vendor ecosystem. This is our full-time focus, unlike internal IT leaders who must also run operations. 


Q: What if advisory recommendations don't work out? 

A: We stay engaged through implementation to ensure recommendations succeed. If approaches don't deliver expected results, we adjust strategy and tactics until objectives are achieved. Your outcomes, not our recommendations, measure our success. 


Q: How quickly can you engage on urgent decisions? 

A: We can typically begin within days for urgent situations. However, we're also candid about timeline constraints—rushing major decisions rarely delivers optimal outcomes. We help organizations balance urgency with decision quality. 

 

Major technology decisions deserve independent expertise. The cost of getting it wrong is too high, and the value of getting it right is too significant to rely solely on vendor guidance. 


Dynamical: Independent Technology Advisory That Delivers Measurable Value. 


References & Sources

1. Standish Group CHAOS Reports (1994-2020) – Long-running research on IT project success rates based on analysis of 50,000+ projects globally. Key findings: 31% success rate, 50% challenged, 19% complete failure.

2. McKinsey & Company and University of Oxford – "Delivering Large-Scale IT Projects On Time, On Budget, and On Value," study of 5,400+ IT projects. Published in Harvard Business Review. Key findings: Large projects average 45% budget overrun, deliver 56% less value than predicted.


Dynamical Tech Cybersecurity logo

Comments


bottom of page